Impacts of Consequentialism on Language

Abstract

In their attempts to evaluate human acts, scholars have proposed many theories. One such theory is consequentialism, an ethical framework that emphasises outcomes as the fundamental determinants of the rightness or wrongness of an action. This theory has certain positive values as it helps to sustain human actions, including language. Besides, it has negative values. Thus, this paper examined the influence of consequentialism on language. In particular, it examined its impacts on language use, assessment, and control. Based on Wittgenstein's language game, Austin's theory of illocutionary acts, and Waldron's criticisms of hate speech, this paper argues that, despite its positive linguistic values, consequentialism undermines language, thereby corrupting rather than improving it. Also, this paper used conceptual analysis as its theoretical framework. This mode of analysis decomposed the topic into its components and then used the essential aspects to interpret it. Besides, it relied on the data from extant literature and the author's intuition to further the analysis. The results showed that though consequentialism has some positive values, it adversely affects language in the area of language use, evaluation, and regulation. Therefore, this paper concluded that framing human action solely in terms of consequentialism poses dangers to language, as issues affecting language use, evaluation, and regulation could lead to language corruption and disfigurement. Subsequently, this paper advocated hybridisation of ethical theories, one that evaluates the nature of an action and its outcome.